
pmid: 28430770
This article is the second of a series of four editorials that report on Medwave’s policies, including section policies, formal requisites according to article type, and guidelines for reviewers and authors, with special emphasis on publication and research ethics. The journal believes that it is important to publish its policies in the format of editorials in order to facilitate and ensure dissemination to our broader readership. This editorial refers to the importance of using reporting guidelines, values and principles, peer review process, authorship issues and publication ethics.
Peer Review, Research, Publishing, Medicine (General), R, Guidelines as Topic, Authorship, Ethics, Research, R5-920, Medicine, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies
Peer Review, Research, Publishing, Medicine (General), R, Guidelines as Topic, Authorship, Ethics, Research, R5-920, Medicine, Humans, Periodicals as Topic, Editorial Policies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
