
Risk management is one of the most important fields that diagnose hazards and traces by the application of various tools available. In any mines or industries it is necessary to estimate and predict the risk associated with the components/equipment or machineries in order to avoid the loss/damage. One of the tools often used for assessing the risk is Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) which addresses causes, effects and risk of each failure mode. Risk priority number(RPN) evaluates the risk associated with each failure mode, which is obtained by the multiple of severity, occurrence and detection rankings. It is very convenient to point out the failure mode with the highest risk if the values of RPN are different. However, it is very difficult to come to a decision if the entire failure modes have the identical values of RPN. This is the major drawback that was found during FMECA analysis. This paper proposes a new methodology to overcome the drawbacks that was found in traditional FMECA.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
