Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PANGRIPTAarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PANGRIPTA
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PANGRIPTA
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

ANALISIS KELAYAKAN PENANGANAN PELESTARIAN CAGAR BUDAYA KOTA MALANG

Authors: Bidang Infrastruktur Dan Kewilyahan;

ANALISIS KELAYAKAN PENANGANAN PELESTARIAN CAGAR BUDAYA KOTA MALANG

Abstract

Dalam pelestarian cagar budaya diperlukan sebuah penilaian atas cagar budaya dan usulan penanganannya, sehingga proses pelestarian cagar budaya dilaksanakan sesuai dengan etika pelestarian dan tepat sasaran. Analisis kelayakan penanganan pelestarian ini bertujuan menilai kondisi fisik dan non fisik cagar budaya untuk mengetahui kelayakan penanganan cagar budaya, sehingga diketahui kelayakan penanganan setiap cagar budaya, untuk kemudian dirumuskan rekomendasi-rekomendasi yang menjadi dasar penanganan untuk setiap cagar budaya yang dikaji. Penilaian kelayakan berdasarkan kriteria-kriteria fisik dan non fisik, yang selanjutnya menjadi variabel dan diberi bobot dan skor. Dari hasil penilaian di peroleh struktur cagar budaya yang memiliki skor kelayakan penanganan tertinggi adalah Buk Gluduk, yaitu sebesar 172 dan yang terendah adalah jembatan Majapahit dengan skor 155. Skor tertinggi 184 untuk bangunan dimiliki Gereja Kathedral Ijen, sedangkan skor terendah dimiliki oleh bangunan MI KH. Badrussalam sebesar 133. Skor tertinggi dimiliki oleh kawasan Bundaran Tugu, yaitu sebesar 108 dan skor terendah dimiliki oleh kawasan jalan pulau-pulau sebesar 98. Strategi preservasi digunakan untuk melindungi objek cagar budaya dengan nilai signifikansi tinggi atau Golongan A. Sedangkan strategi konservasi lebih diarahkan untuk objek cagar budaya dengan nilai signifikansi sedang atau Golongan B. Sebaliknya untuk objek cagar budaya dengan nilai signifikansi rendah diarahkan menggunakan strategi demolisi.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold