Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Simultaneous parallel astrogeodetic observations using two digital zenith camera systems: Comparing CODIAC and VESTA

Authors: Albayrak, M.; Varna, I.; Willi, D.; Guillaume, S.; Zarins, A.; Ozen, M.;

Simultaneous parallel astrogeodetic observations using two digital zenith camera systems: Comparing CODIAC and VESTA

Abstract

Nowadays, zenith telescope-based digital zenith camera systems (DZCSs), such as the Compact Digital Astronomical Camera (CODIAC) and VErtical by STArs (VESTA), are used to determine highly accurate astrogeodetic deflections of the vertical (DoVs). The CODIAC and VESTA were developed by ETH Zurich and University of Latvia, respectively, and only two CODIAC and four VESTA systems have been produced. The CODIAC system has a proven accuracy higher than 0.05″, while the accuracy of VESTA is ~0.1″. These two DZCSs, which are the most used DZCSs of the last decade, have been used effectively over many survey campaigns. The CODIAC system replaced the DIADEM in the second (Iowa) and third (Colorado) geoid slope validation surveys in the United States. Meanwhile, VESTA has been used for dense DoV measurements in Latvia; these DoVs were used for quasi-geoid determination. In this study, we used both the CODIAC and VESTA to conduct simultaneous observations at the School of Management and Engineering Vaud (HEIG-VD) in Yverdon-les-Bains, Switzerland over five nights in August, 2021. The previous version of the CODIAC, the DIADEM, had been used for simultaneous parallel measurements against the University of Hannover’s DZCS, the TZK2-D. Our DZCS measurements with CODIAC and VESTA mark the second time that simultaneous parallel observations have been made with two different DZCSs. Additionally, the VESTA has never been tested against another DZCS through comparative simultaneous measurements. This comparison between the VESTA and CODIAC systems has allowed for VESTA accuracy validation and checking the agreement between the two DZCSs.

The 28th IUGG General Assembly (IUGG2023) (Berlin 2023)

Country
Germany
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!