
Multi-label datasets contain several classes, where each class can have multiple values. They appear in several domains such as music categorization into emotions and directed marketing. In this chapter, we are interested in the most popular task of Data Mining, which is the classification, more precisely classification in multi-label datasets. To do this, we will present the different methods used to extract knowledge from these datasets. These methods are divided into two categories: problem transformation methods and algorithm adaptation ones. The methods of the first category transform multi-label classification problem into one or more single classification problems. While the methods of the second category extend a specific learning algorithm, in order to handle multi-label datasets directly. Also, we will present the different evaluation measures used to evaluate the quality of extracted knowledge.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial intelligence, Class (philosophy), Economics, Multi-label classification, Pattern recognition (psychology), Computer science, Detection and Prevention of Phishing Attacks, Management, Task (project management), Artificial Intelligence, Categorization, Multi-label Text Classification in Machine Learning, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Machine learning, Text categorization, Multi-label Learning, Active Learning in Machine Learning Research, Data mining, Information Systems
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial intelligence, Class (philosophy), Economics, Multi-label classification, Pattern recognition (psychology), Computer science, Detection and Prevention of Phishing Attacks, Management, Task (project management), Artificial Intelligence, Categorization, Multi-label Text Classification in Machine Learning, Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Machine learning, Text categorization, Multi-label Learning, Active Learning in Machine Learning Research, Data mining, Information Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
