
The relationship between Abrahamic religions and environment is a delicate one. Critical voices argue that already in Genesis the human being is situated in a hierarchical position above the animals. Only by admitting his animal status humankind could be freed from its arrogance. Other voices point instead to the solidarity between human beings and animals as fellow-creatures. Particularly in Jewish interpretation (midrash), the dignity of the human being goes together with responsibility for the whole of creation, a responsibility which cannot be required from animals. In addition, the seventh day is a day of rest for human beings and for animals. It is our anthropocentric reading of the Bible that has excluded animals from our religious consciousness. In this chapter, the religious attitude toward animals and to nature in the three Abrahamic religions will be documented. a bit more. A purely anthropocentric reading of sacred Scripture has been dominant the last centuries, but fails to do justice to the Bible. The protestant bias against nature by identifying it with idolatry and with fertility cults of a goddess has also caused a blind spot for the environment in religious perspective.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
