Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://www.intechop...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://www.intechopen.com/cha...
Part of book or chapter of book
License: CC BY NC SA
Data sources: UnpayWall
https://doi.org/10.5772/15416...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

How Vertical Wind Shear Affects Tropical Cyclone Intensity Change: An Overview

Authors: Levi Thatcher; Zhaoxia Pu;

How Vertical Wind Shear Affects Tropical Cyclone Intensity Change: An Overview

Abstract

Over the last 30 years tropical cyclone (TC) intensity forecasts, for various (yet somewhat puzzling) reasons, have not achieved near the level of improvement of the TC track forecast. Although TCs have been studied intensively throughout the twentieth century, the community has surprisingly little quantitative knowledge as to how these storms interact with their environments, particularly with respect to changes in core structure (Frank & Ritchie, 1999). Rogers et al. (2006) stated that the lack of skill in numerical forecast of TC intensity can be partly attributed to inadequate understanding of the physics of TCs and the way they interact with their environment. In fact, TC structure and intensity changes are affected by a large and complex array of physical processes that govern the inner core structure and the interaction between the storm and both the underlying ocean and its atmospheric environment (Wang & Wu, 2004). Among other issues cited, crude parameterizations, difficulties in treating multiscale interactions, and the uncertainties involved with initializing the model over areas with sparse data coverage have received substantial attention. In order to predict TC intensity, one of the important questions has been how to first accurately predict a TC’s maximum potential intensity (MPI). Despite the fact that various methods for predicting a storm’s MPI have been put forth, the failure of the NWP community to realistically forecast TC intensity largely lies in the fact that there are various unexplained processes keeping TCs from reaching their theoretical MPI. While the mechanisms involved are myriad, there are essentially two kinds that have been identified as having the largest impact on TC intensification: 1) internal dynamics and 2) external forcing from environmental flow. Below these two headings fall most TC intensity-related topics: vertical wind shear-induced asymmetries in the core region, the cooling of the sea surface due to oceanic upwelling under the eyewall region, the role of inner and outer rainbands, vortex Rossby waves (VRWs), embedded mesovortices, and eyewall cycles. Tropical cyclones often fail to reach their theoretical MPI because prominent MPI calculations use the basic assumption of TC axisymmetry (Camp & Montgomery, 2001), whereas TC structure is rarely symmetric, even in mature storms. While the tangential wind field and other TC features are axisymmetric, many significant features, such as VRWs, eyewall cycles, rainfall, convection, radial winds, and outer rainbands are often highly asymmetric attributes that impact TC intensity change; it is thus no surprise that nearly all TCs fail to reach their MPI.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Green
hybrid