Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ mEDRAarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
mEDRA
Book . 2017
Data sources: mEDRA
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
addClaim

Low back pain and radicular pain

assessment and management
Authors: Van Wambeke, Peter; Desomer, Anja; Ailliet, Luc; Berquin, Anne; Demoulin, Christophe; Depreitere, Bart; Dewachter, Johan; +17 Authors

Low back pain and radicular pain

Abstract

SCIENTIFIC REPORT 12 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 12 -- 1.1 BACKGROUND 12 -- 1.2 THE NEED FOR A GUIDELINE 13 -- 1.3 SCOPE 13 -- 1.4 REMIT OF THE GUIDELINE 14 -- 1.4.1 Overall objectives 14 -- 1.4.2 Multidisciplinary approach 14 -- 1.4.3 Patient-centered care 14 -- 1.4.4 Target users of the guideline 14 -- 1.5 STATEMENT OF INTENT 14 -- 1.6 FUNDING AND DECLARATION OF INTEREST 15 -- 2 METHODOLOGY 15 -- 2.1 THE GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT GROUP 15 -- 2.2 GENERAL APPROACH 16 -- 2.3 SEARCH FOR EXISTING GUIDELINES 16 -- 2.4 CLINICAL RESEARCH QUESTIONS 17 -- 2.5 NICE METHODOLOGY 19 -- 2.5.1 Searching for evidence 19 -- 2.5.2 Grading evidence 20 -- 2.6 ANALYSIS OF NICE REVIEW 22 -- 2.7 FORMULATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS 23 -- 2.8 EXTERNAL REVIEW 26 -- 2.8.1 Healthcare professionals (stakeholders) 26 -- 2.9 FINAL VALIDATION 26 -- 3 CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS 26 -- 3.1 ASSESSMENT OF LOW BACK PAIN AND RADICULAR PAIN 26 -- 3.1.1 History taking and clinical examination 26 -- 3.1.2 Risk assessment and stratification 29 -- 3.1.3 Imaging 35 -- 3.2 NON-INVASIVE TREATMENT (MEDICATION EXCLUDED) 38 -- 3.2.1 Self-management 38 -- 3.2.2 Exercise therapies 43 -- 3.2.3 Postural therapies 52 -- 3.2.4 Orthotics and appliances 57 -- 3.2.5 Manual Therapies 61 -- 3.2.6 Acupuncture 72 -- 3.2.7 Electrotherapies 77 -- 3.2.8 Psychological interventions 86 -- 3.2.9 Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs. 90 -- 3.2.10 Return to work programs 98 -- 3.2.11 Back schools 101 -- 3.3 MEDICATIONS 102 -- 3.3.1 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) 102 -- 3.3.2 Paracetamol 107 -- 3.3.3 Opioids 110 -- 3.3.4 Antidepressants 114 -- 3.3.5 Anticonvulsants 117 -- 3.3.6 Skeletal muscle relaxants 120 -- 3.3.7 Antibiotics 122 -- 3.3.8 Oral Methylprednisolone 124 -- 3.4 INVASIVE TREATMENTS 124 -- 3.4.1 Spinal injections 124 -- 3.4.2 Radiofrequency denervation for facet joint pain 128 -- 3.4.3 Epidural injections 134 -- 3.4.4 Surgery and prognostic factors. 140 -- 3.4.5 Disc replacement 143 -- 3.4.6 Spinal fusion 146 -- 3.4.7 Spinal decompression 151 -- 4 IMPLEMENTATION AND UPDATING OF THE GUIDELINE 156 -- 4.1 IMPLEMENTATION 156 -- 4.1.1 Actors of the implementation of this guideline 156 -- 4.1.2 Barriers and facilitators for implementation of this guideline 156 -- 4.2 MONITORING THE QUALITY OF CARE 157 -- 4.3 GUIDELINE UPDATE 157 -- REFERENCES 158

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average