
Software Maintainability (SM) has been studied since it became globally accepted as part of the software quality model. Many researchers have been proposing a lot of metrics to be used as SM indicators. Nevertheless, the descriptions of these metrics are scattered in a larger number of studies, where many do not explain what these metrics should measure. Therefore, this paper presents a research about SM metrics’ adoption in Brazilian software companies. We performed semi-structured interviews in a face-to-face fashion with 10 software companies resulting in 23 SM metrics listed, and 14 tools for supporting SM metrics collection. Our results showed evidence that most of the SM metrics proposed by researchers are not used by practitioners.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
