
Classical regression generally assumes that all subjects follow a common model with the same set of parameters. With ever advancing capabilities of modern technologies to collect more subjects and more covariates, it has become increasingly common that there exist subgroups of subjects, and each group follows a different regression model with a different set of parameters. In this article, we propose a new approach for subgroup analysis in regression modeling. Specifically, we model the relation between a response and a set of primary predictors, while we explicitly model the heterogenous association given another set of auxiliary predictors, through the interaction between the primary and auxiliary variables. We introduce penalties to induce the sparsity and group structures within the regression coefficients, and to achieve simultaneous feature selection for both primary predictors that are significantly associated with the response, as well as the auxiliary predictors that define the subgroups. We establish the asymptotic guarantees in terms of parameter estimation consistency and cluster estimation consistency. We illustrate our method with an analysis of the functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.
high-dimensional regressions, Statistics, group Lasso, adolescent brain cognitive development study, subgroup analysis, functional magnetic resonance imaging, Article
high-dimensional regressions, Statistics, group Lasso, adolescent brain cognitive development study, subgroup analysis, functional magnetic resonance imaging, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
