Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Iryo Yakugaku (Japan...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of Quality of Orodispersible Famotidine Tablets

ファモチジン口腔内崩壊錠の品質評価
Authors: Asami Kashima; Takashi Kobayashi; Mariko Kobayashi; Eriko Tanaka; Kyoko Fukumoto; Kazuyuki Ueno;

Evaluation of Quality of Orodispersible Famotidine Tablets

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of orodispersible famotidine tablets (15 versions of 8 preparations comprising the original product and 7 generic products), a hardness test, dropping shock test, abrasion test, and bitter taste test were conducted. Large differences were observed in the hardness, dropping shock, and abrasion tests among the preparations. In the dropping shock and abrasion tests, however, no change was observed in the appearance of some preparations but the tablet weight decreased or tablets broke into pieces with some of them. In the taste test, 4 preparations were found to be masked sufficiently against bitter taste, but 4 preparations were not. These results suggest that some of the generic products were superior in quality to the original product and some were inferior. It is therefore necessary to adequately evaluate differences in quality when selecting generic products.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze