Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
The Planterarrow_drop_down
The Planter
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Varietal Reaction and Nutrient Management of Coconut Eriophyid Mite

Authors: MUTHIAH C; C NATARAJAN;

Varietal Reaction and Nutrient Management of Coconut Eriophyid Mite

Abstract

Bio-ecology, symptoms of damage and yield loss caused by the coconut eriophyid mite Aceria guerreronis Keifer are described. The pest continues to be a cause of concern in Asian countries causing high economic losses. Chemical pesticides are not considered safe to human and environment. Screening of 31 coconut genotypes and 34 hybrids for four years revealed four genotypes Chowghat Orange Dwarf (1.99), Spicata (2.41), Siam (2.50), British Solomon Island (2.5) and two hybrids [JGxECT (1.61) and CCxPHO (2.34)] significantly recorded minimum damage grade index due to mite and found to be moderately resistant. Further screening will be needed. Application of Borax (50 g) or calcium (1 kg) along with the NPK (0.56: 0.32: 1.20 NPK kg/palm/ year) and Farm Yard Manure (50 kg) registered low damage grade index (3.36 and 3.53) due to mite compared to control (4.28). The effect of different nutrients against mite damage in young bunches could not be realised significantly even after two years. Application of all four bio-fertilisers Azospirillum, Azatobacter, Phosphobacteria and J;;4.M endomycorrhiza in combinations registered less damage grade index (3.08) compared to control (4.30). Mite damage in young bunches was also less (79.54%) in treatment with all four bio-fertilisers as compared to control (85.52%) but the differences were not significant after one year. Keywords : Coconut, eriophyid mite, Aceria guerreronis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!