
doi: 10.5586/am.2004.012
Isolates of ascochyta blight fungi, two of <i>Ascochyta pisi</i>, four of <i>Mycosphaerella pinodes</i> and four of <i>Phoma pinodella</i> were stored: A - on slants under mineral oil, B - on CN's medium agar disks, and as conidial suspension: C - in glycerine, D · in water. Viability and pathogenicity of recovered cultures after each consecutive year were assesed from 1991 to 1999. The compared parameters were first of all strongly influenced by the preservation method, but fungus species and number of years had a minor importance. The best for longer storage was method "A" because after 9 years the isolates were viable, highly pathogenic, and cultures recovered from them were clean. Thc method "C'' is good for short keeping (2-3 years), as conidia in vials need only small space and gave clean cultures.
Phoma, QH301-705.5, Ascochytai, Mycosphaerella, pathogenicity, preservation methods, Biology (General), Pisum
Phoma, QH301-705.5, Ascochytai, Mycosphaerella, pathogenicity, preservation methods, Biology (General), Pisum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
