Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ BioSCIENCEarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
BioSCIENCE
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Avaliação da prevalência de infecção por Epstein-Barr vírus na hiperplasia de tonsilas palatinas através da imunoexpressão do marcador LMP-1.

Authors: José Fernando Polanski; Paula Dias; Julia Goginski; Lucas Sita; Ana Sobral; Luiz Collaço;

Avaliação da prevalência de infecção por Epstein-Barr vírus na hiperplasia de tonsilas palatinas através da imunoexpressão do marcador LMP-1.

Abstract

Introduction: LMP-1 (latent membrane protein 1) is a membrane protein found in EBV and can be identified through immunohistochemistry. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of EBV virus in tonsillar tissue samples correlating with tonsil size, age and gender. Methods: An LMP-1 immunohistochemical study was performed in slides from patients with tonsil hyperplasia. Results: The sample consisted of 120 slides, 66 were from male. The average tonsillar size was 6.0 cm2 (1.5-14.0) and the average age was 6.5 years (2-18). Overall, 72 patients were positive for the virus, the majority being male (51%) and preschoolers (51.4%). For comparative analysis, the sample was divided: group 1 (positive immunohistochemistry) and group 2 (negative immunohistochemistry). The average age was 6.74 years (± 4.14) and 6.19 years (± 3.82) for group 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 had 37 preschoolers, 23 school-age children and 12 adolescents. Group 2 had 28 preschoolers, 14 school-age children and 6 adolescents (p=0.71). To evaluate the presence of virus, the slides were divided according to area: G (≥6cm²) and P (<6cm²). In G group, 54 slides were positive, while in P group, 18 were positive. Group 1 presented 54 of G group slides and 18 of P group slides, with no statistical difference, but with a tendency to positivity (p=0.09). Conclusion: Most of the sample was positive for the presence of Epstein-Barr virus. There was no difference in the virus presence or absence when correlated with the tonsillar size, age or sex.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid