Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal for Research...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology
Article . 2024 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Distribution of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHF) Infections Among Animals and Human in Diyala Province

Authors: Safa Ibrahim Jaber;

Distribution of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus (CCHF) Infections Among Animals and Human in Diyala Province

Abstract

In this study, 30 blood samples were collected from Human patients infected with CCHF virus residing in Alrazi Hospital, 30 samples from cattles and 30 from goats from the veterinary medical clinic in Baquba city. Also, 15 blood samples were taken from healthy individuals, 15 samples from healthy cattles and 15 samples from healthy goats as control groups. The study was carried out during the period from, 15th January to 30th June 2023 in Diyala Province. According to the results, the (Mean±S.E) of Human anti IgM antibodies was 2.40±0.26 in patients with CCHF and 2.13±0.23 in cattles with non-significant differences, while the (Mean±S.E) of anti IgM antibodies was 1.72±0.15 in goats with a significant difference between goats and humans (p=0.03). The (Mean±S.E) of Human anti IgG antibodies was 1.42±0.11 in patients with CCHF and 1.27±0.12 in cattles with non-significant differences. Also, the mean ±S.E of anti IgG was 1.24±0.11 in goats with non-significant differences between the animals and Humans. The mean ±S.E of anti-IgM Human antibodies was 2.40±0.26 compared to the control group 0.08±0.05 with a highly significant difference p<0.001. The mean of anti-IgG human antibodies was 1.42±0.11 compared to the control group 0.13±0.06 with a highly significant difference p<0.001. The mean of anti-IgM cattle antibodies was 2.13±0.23 compared to the control group 0.08±0.04, with a highly significant difference p<0.001. The mean of anti-IgG antibodies was 1.27±0.12 compared to the control group 0.09±0.04 with a highly significant difference p<0.001. The mean of anti-IgM goat antibodies was 2.13±0.23 compared to the control group 0.08±0.04 with a highly significant difference p<0.001. finally, the mean of anti-IgG antibodies was 1.27±0.12 compared to the control group 0.09±0.04 with a highly significant difference p<0.001.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold