
handle: 10807/229288 , 11379/534099
The purpose of this paper is to propose a new empirical model capable of highlighting some aspects of cross-economy convergence which cannot be caught by the popular beta-convergence and sigma-convergence models. The idea is to analyse the growth of the economies as a function of the distance between the observed output per capita and the average output per capita within the sample, separating the behaviour of poorest and richest economies. After its specification, I applied the model to the case of the Russian regions over the period 1995-2015 using the fixed-effect estimator. The results show that, although the existence of a significant beta-convergence process, there is a lack of convergence in differences. When the differences between regional and national output per capita are negative, a positive and significant relationship between growth and levels emerges. Such a relationship turns to be negative and non-significant when the differences are positive, therefore denoting weak non-linearity between growth rate and level of output per capita. Similar findings have been found for labor productivity.
Beta-convergence
Beta-convergence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
