
Base editors, including adenine base editors (ABEs) and cytosine base editors (CBEs), are widely used in numerous organisms to introduce site-specific sequence modifications in genomic DNA without causing double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, these editors exhibit low editing efficiencies, particularly in dicot plants, thereby limiting their application in dicot plant genome engineering. In this study, we assessed the editing efficiencies of various base editors to identify those optimal for base editing in dicot plants. We discovered that ABE8e, an ABE variant, demonstrated superior A-to-G base editing efficiency within A5-A8 windows, and A3A/Y130F-V04, a CBE variant, exhibited the highest C-to-T base editing efficiency within C4-C15 windows in both Arabidopsis and soybean protoplasts. Overall, we recommend these two base editors as prime choices for efficient genome engineering in a range of crop plants. [BMB Reports 2025; 58(7): 288-292].
Gene Editing, Cytosine, Glycine max, Adenine, Arabidopsis, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Article, Genome, Plant
Gene Editing, Cytosine, Glycine max, Adenine, Arabidopsis, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Article, Genome, Plant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
