
pmid: 23101507
Determination of the type and origin of the body fluids found at a crime scene can give important insights into crime scene reconstruction by supporting a link between sample donors and actual criminal acts. For more than a century, numerous types of body fluid identification methods have been developed, such as chemical tests, immunological tests, protein catalytic activity tests, spectroscopic methods and microscopy. However, these conventional body fluid identification methods are mostly presumptive, and are carried out for only one body fluid at a time. Therefore, the use of a molecular genetics-based approach using RNA profiling or DNA methylation detection has been recently proposed to supplant conventional body fluid identification methods. Several RNA markers and tDMRs (tissue-specific differentially methylated regions) which are specific to forensically relevant body fluids have been identified, and their specificities and sensitivities have been tested using various samples. In this review, we provide an overview of the present knowledge and the most recent developments in forensic body fluid identification and discuss its possible practical application to forensic casework.
DNA methylation, 000, mRNA, Forensic, Acid Phosphatase, Forensic Sciences, 610, Body fluid identification, Immunological test, DNA, Alternate light source, DNA Methylation, Chemical test, Body Fluids, MicroRNAs, Catalytic test, Humans, RNA, RNA, Messenger, miRNA
DNA methylation, 000, mRNA, Forensic, Acid Phosphatase, Forensic Sciences, 610, Body fluid identification, Immunological test, DNA, Alternate light source, DNA Methylation, Chemical test, Body Fluids, MicroRNAs, Catalytic test, Humans, RNA, RNA, Messenger, miRNA
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 183 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
