
doi: 10.5482/ha-1133
pmid: 21152677
SummaryAlthough the utility of platelet function testing is still under debate, the necessity to inhibit platelets in patients suffering from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease is undoubted and well proven. The wide variety of available platelet function tests often using different methodologies, the apparent lack of standardization, and finally the emerging evidence on the clinical value of platelet function testing are resulting in a considerable uncertainty in the clinical practice, how to deal with the issue of platelet function testing. Platelet function testing might not only yield clinical benefits for the patients but also economical advantages by identifying the right drug at the right dose for the right patient.This article intends to provide an overview of the current platelet function tests such as light transmittance aggregometry, whole blood impedance aggregometry, the PFA-1001 system, the VerifyNow2 system, flow cytometry, as well as other promising technologies like Plateletworks3, IMPACT-R4, PADA, thromboelastography, and the mean platelet component (MPC), briefly addressing strengths, weaknesses and clinical utility of these tests.
Ticlopidine, Aspirin, Platelet Aggregation, Platelet Function Tests, Coronary Thrombosis, Hemorrhage, Platelet Activation, Clopidogrel, Platelet Adhesiveness, Intracranial Embolism, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Intracranial Thrombosis, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
Ticlopidine, Aspirin, Platelet Aggregation, Platelet Function Tests, Coronary Thrombosis, Hemorrhage, Platelet Activation, Clopidogrel, Platelet Adhesiveness, Intracranial Embolism, Predictive Value of Tests, Humans, Intracranial Thrombosis, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
