
doi: 10.54648/bula2016041
This article argues that in light of the restricted application of the ‘navigation and management exception’ under the Hague- Visby Rules, the exclusion of the exception in the Hamburg and Rotterdam Rules is undesirable. Also, it was shown that the fire exception provisions under the Hamburg and Rotterdam Rules are not substantially different from the fire exception under the Hague-Visby Rules. In light of these, the position of the Hamburg and Rotterdam Rules in relation to the exceptions is unjustifiable.
K Law (General), K1
K Law (General), K1
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
