
doi: 10.5414/cpp44027
pmid: 16425968
Methacholine challenge testing is common for assessing the pharmacodynamic properties of anti-asthma drugs. In order to design studies and to interpret published studies, sample size calculations are essential. Unfortunately, wrong sample sizes were previously reported in the literature. We present correct sample sizes required for the comparison of two treatments based on methacholine challenge testing in a crossover study.Formulas for sample size calculations and the resulting number of subjects required for a specified power are presented for studies designed to show a difference as well as for equivalence and non-inferiority studies.A much larger sample size is required for methacholine challenge testing than previously reported.
Cross-Over Studies, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Bronchoconstrictor Agents, Predictive Value of Tests, Sample Size, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Algorithms, Methacholine Chloride
Cross-Over Studies, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Bronchoconstrictor Agents, Predictive Value of Tests, Sample Size, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Algorithms, Methacholine Chloride
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
