
There is a great tendency in the world of psychology to assume that we are basically all the same. We may have varied neuroses and psychoses, but everything can be studied as if there were just one level of consciousness. An alternative view is that human beings are in a process of development which has various way-stations, nameable and researchable, which make a structural difference to their thinking and feeling and experiencing. In this paper I argue that the latter position, radical as it is, needs to be considered when engaging in psychology, so as not to hold back or deny this developmental process. It also makes it very clear how important the idea of authenticity can be in the therapeutic process.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
