<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>

COPY SCRIPT

For further information contact us at helpdesk@openaire.eu

The National Planning Policy Framework and Archaeology: Response to the Respondents

Name: The National Planning Policy Framework and Archaeology: Response to the Respondents
Keywords: Archaeology, development; planning; National Planning Policy Framework

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article , Other literature type 14 Feb 2013Publisher:UCL PressJournal:Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, volume 22 (eissn: 2041-9015,

Authors: Joe Flatman; Dominic Perring;

doi: 10.5334/pia.400

The National Planning Policy Framework and Archaeology: Response to the Respondents

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

The respondents to our paper highlight a lot of similarity of thought and worry about the NPPF. The two biggest emotions seem to be ‘it could have been worse’ and ‘we must wait and see how it pans out’. That isn’t the most inspiring of positions for a community to be in, but chimes with the general emotions surrounding life in Britain in mid 2012, post-Olympics community fervour notwithstanding.

Related Organizations

English Heritage
United Kingdom
UCL Institute of Archaeology
United Kingdom
UCL Institute of Archaeology
United Kingdom

Keywords

Archaeology, development; planning; National Planning Policy Framework

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average

Found an issue? Give us feedback

Average

gold

Related to Research communities

Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage