
doi: 10.5334/pb.995
The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of an explicit generation task in order to assess the explicit knowledge acquired by the subjects in an artificial grammar learning task. To determine the sensitivity of the generation task and to ensure that the knowledge shown in this task is actually related to information learned during the study phase (and not to information learned during the classification phase), a group of normal subjects were administered the generation task in different conditions: after the classification phase with and without a study phase, or immediately after the study phase. The main result is that performance in the generation task is specifically related to information learned during the study phase and not to information presented during the classification phase; moreover, there was no correlation between the implicit and explicit measures, suggesting that the generation task can be considered as a valid measure of explicit knowledge in artificial grammar learning tasks.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
