Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Open Huma...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Open Humanities Data (JOHD)
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/re...
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

From Wikidata to CIDOC CRM: A Use Case Scenario for Digital Comparative Literary Studies

A Use Case Scenario for Digital Comparative Literary Studies
Authors: Laura Untner;

From Wikidata to CIDOC CRM: A Use Case Scenario for Digital Comparative Literary Studies

Abstract

This discussion paper introduces a modular data model and Python-based workflow for transforming structured data from Wikidata into a formal ontology grounded in the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM), the object-oriented Library Reference Model (LRMoo) by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, and INTRO (the Intertextual, Interpictorial, and Intermedial Relations Ontology). Designed especially for digital comparative literary studies, the workflow supports the semantic modeling of information about authors, works, and – most importantly – intertextual phenomena automatically derived from Wikidata. It does so by employing established standards in the humanities while keeping interpretive attributions explicit. In this way, textual features and intertextual relations are framed as scholarly interpretations rather than objective facts. During post-processing, a mapping and alignment strategy integrates identifiers and connections to other ontologies relevant to literary studies and the modeling of textual relations. The resulting graph thus transforms Wikidata’s heterogeneous data into a more stable and interoperable form for humanities research – and especially comparative literary studies – by grounding it in standards used in GLAM institutions (galleries, libraries, archives, and museums) and across the Digital Humanities, and further aligning it with complementary ontologies. This paper presents the data model based on the Web Ontology Language (OWL) and accompanied by validation shapes in the Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL), introduces the workflow released as the Python package wiki2crm, and discusses challenges and opportunities, with a focus on working with Wikidata and potential future developments.

Related Organizations
Keywords

intertextuality, Wikidata, Geschichte, Darstellung, Literaturwissenschaft und- kritik, textual relations, literary studies, information integration, data modeling

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold