
W artykule podjęto próbę oszacowania wielkości kosztów transakcyjnych ponoszonych przez ARiMR na pozyskanie wsparcia unijnego dla polskiej wsi i rolnictwa oraz efektywności i kosztochłonności tego procesu w latach 2004–2010. Analiza wykazała, że ARiMR lokuje się w grupie instytucji tego typu uznawanych za efektywne.
H1-99, koszty transakcyjne, Agriculture (General), Economic history and conditions, Plant culture, wsparcie unijne, Forestry, HC10-1085, SD1-669.5, efektywność i kosztochłonność, SF1-1100, S1-972, SB1-1110, Animal culture, Social sciences (General)
H1-99, koszty transakcyjne, Agriculture (General), Economic history and conditions, Plant culture, wsparcie unijne, Forestry, HC10-1085, SD1-669.5, efektywność i kosztochłonność, SF1-1100, S1-972, SB1-1110, Animal culture, Social sciences (General)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
