
doi: 10.53010/brtt9946
The following outlines the process of applying the jurisprudential line methodology proposed by López Medina (2006) to those Colombian judicial rulings that address the study of the following factual scenario: (A) a state entity causes, through its conduct (active or passive), pure environmental damage, from which (B) a subjective impact on specific individuals arises, depriving them of the use or enjoyment of the values that the surrounding ecosystems provided them before the damage. This aims to collect the solutions that judges in Colombia have given to litigation involving this type of damage to determine the decision-making trend in this regard. This is, therefore, the methodological complement to the research article "The Decision-Making Development of the Jurisprudence of the Colombian Council of State Regarding the Reparation of Direct Consecutive Environmental Damage," published by Naturaleza y Sociedad. Desafíos Medioambientales, which deeply reflects on the decision-making development of the jurisprudence of the Colombian Council of State regarding the reparation of direct consecutive environmental damage.
Environmental sciences, Environmental law, GE1-350, K3581-3598
Environmental sciences, Environmental law, GE1-350, K3581-3598
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
