
Objectives To analyze the data of our department with regard to the treatment of kidney cancer, with particular attention to nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Data of initial experience on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) were also analyzed. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2010, at the Urology Clinic of Padua, 780 procedures for kidney cancer were performed: 462 radical nephrectomies (RN), 289 open partial nephrectomies (OPN), and 29 robot-assisted partial nephrectomies (RAPN). Between January 2010 and July 2011 41 RAPN as well as 38 OPN were performed. Results The average volume of tumors treated with RAPN was 2.17 cm, 1.98 cm, and 2.78 cm in the first, second, and third half-year, respectively. The mean operative time was 220 minutes, 200 minutes, and 180 minutes in the first, second, and third half-year, respectively. The average warm ischemia time was 24 minutes, 22 minutes, and 21 minutes in the first, second, and third half-year, respectively. The average estimated blood loss was 170 mL, 160 mL, and 180 mL in the first, second, and third half-year, respectively. In the same period, the average volume of tumors treated with OPN was 3.7 cm, 3.9 cm, and 5.7 cm respectively in the first, second, and third half-year. Conclusions We have observed a gradual extension of the indications for NSS. The systematic application of robotic surgery has allowed for the treatment of even more complex cases with relatively low learning curve. OPN has therefore become a technique that should be reserved for more complex cases.
Blood Loss, Surgical, Nephrons, Robotics, Nephrectomy, Kidney Neoplasms, Tumor Burden, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopy, Warm Ischemia, Organ Sparing Treatments, Learning Curve, Retrospective Studies
Blood Loss, Surgical, Nephrons, Robotics, Nephrectomy, Kidney Neoplasms, Tumor Burden, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopy, Warm Ischemia, Organ Sparing Treatments, Learning Curve, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
