Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Oxford University Re...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DataBank, Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
Doctoral thesis . 2021
License: rioxx All Rights Reserved
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Withdrawing from international regimes: bargaining power in the investment treaty regime

W
Authors: Huikuri, TA;

Withdrawing from international regimes: bargaining power in the investment treaty regime

Abstract

Why do some states withdraw from international regimes? How do others successfully renegotiate the terms of international cooperation? This thesis investigates whether, and how, the changing bargaining power relations impact treaty-based cooperation in the international investment treaty regime. The institutional architecture to govern investments consists of a web of bilateral investment treaties (BITs). The investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism embedded in most BITs has resulted in an accumulation of arbitration cases between host governments and foreign investors, and states have increasingly begun to question their investment treaties. I argue that while states have learned about the true risks of investment treaties through ISDS, they must have sufficient bargaining power to act in response. Bargaining power is best understood as alternatives to the existing agreements. Alternative economic treaties and domestic investment laws facilitate foreign investment and decrease dependency on the existing agreements. Economic improvement can also bring confidence for a government that such alternatives can be developed. When sufficient alternatives are in place, a state can either exit the agreement, demand renegotiation, or conduct a strategic exit with intentions to renegotiate at a later stage. The optimal strategy for a revisionist state depends on the bilateral relationship between the states, and how important they consider their partnership. I employ a mixed methods approach to provide evidence for my argument. I use data on bilateral investment treaties to show that bargaining power is associated with greater risk of BIT termination and renegotiation. Relative changes in economic power also condition the effects of ISDS on BIT outcomes. Interviews conducted with Ecuadorian and Indonesian policymakers show that governments are strategic in reflecting on their outside options when considering BIT reform. By examining the dynamics of investment treaty reform, this thesis contributes to a better understanding of change in international regimes governing the world economy.

Country
United Kingdom
Keywords

Qualitative research, FOS: Political science, Diplomatic negotiations in international disputes, International organization, International cooperation, Political science, Quantitative research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green