Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

F35 Expansion Excavations (Phase 2.1), RAF Lakenheath, Archaeological Excavation Report

Authors: Brooks, R;

F35 Expansion Excavations (Phase 2.1), RAF Lakenheath, Archaeological Excavation Report

Abstract

Archaeological excavations were carried out at the east end of RAF Lakenheath, Suffolk. The archaeological horizons were well preserved. Underlying these was a deposit of windblown sand, likely built up during the medieval and post-medieval periods. Underlying the windblown material was a deposit of humose-enriched coversand, which contained concentrations of Beaker pottery and worked flint, particularly in its lower horizon, alongside heat altered flint and stone, and very low levels of calcinated bone and snail shell. The finds assemblage was composed of material that suggested domestic dumps of material that had been transported from its primary production and use areas, but was unlikely to have been moved far, suggesting nearby occupation. Environmental and soil analysis suggested that the soil was the result of deforestation of the landscape, with heathland taking over, indicated by the pollen profile and podsolisation of the coversand. There was a suggestion from the soil structure, pollen and macrofossils that there was tillage/ cultivation occurring locally and that soil was being imported to the site. Natural features, interpreted as root hollows, were excavated and found to also contain artefacts and ecofacts similar in composition to the soil layers, and it is interpreted that this suggests deliberate deforestation, or at least management and levelling of the soil horizons, possibly further indicating agricultural practices. It has been difficult to directly tie the possible tillage/land management to the Beaker occupation, but it is considered likely that they are associated. Excavations to the north-west uncovered a freeze thaw deposit and natural hollow/mere.

Keywords

Archaeology, Grey Literature

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!