Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) diabolica

Authors: Ibáñez-Bernal, Sergio; Durán-Luz, Juana;

Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) diabolica

Abstract

Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) diabolica (Hall, 1936) diabolicus Hall, 1936: 28 (as Phlebotomus (Brumptomyia )). Localidad tipo: United States of America, Texas, Uvalde. Phlebotomus diabolicus Hall: Lindquist (1936, immature descriptions), Dampf (1938, mention), Floch & Abonnenc (1943, taxonomy), Rozeboom (1944, listed), Addis (1945a, taxonomy), Addis (1945b, key), Packchanian (1946, listed), Barretto (1947, as Flebotomus, catalogue), Fairchild & Hertig (1948a, cf. to gomezi and cruciatus), Thurman et al. (1949, listed), Fairchild & Hertig (1953b, redescription, keys), Vargas & Díaz-Nájera (1953b, Mexican distribution), Quate (1955, keys), Fairchild & Hertig (1959, distribution), Lewis & Garnham (1959, mention), Eads et al. (1965, listed), Quate (1965, listed), Easton et al. (1968, Texas records). Lutzomyia diabolica (Hall): Theodor (1965, classification, listed), Disney (1968, as synonym of L. cruciata), Díaz-Nájera (1971, Coahuila records), Gustafson et al. (1985, mention), Lawyer et al. (1987), Endris et al. (1987), McHugh (1991). Lutzomyia cruciata, not cruciata (Coquillett) (as synonym of L. cruciata): Rosabal & Miller (1970, key), Martins & MoralesFrías (1972, in part, distribution), Young (1972, in part, Texas records), Eads (1978, in part, Texas records), Chaniotis (1978, mention), Martins et al. (1978, catalogue, distribution). Lutzomyia cruciata diabolica (Hall): Lewis (1975a, mouthparts morphology). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) diabolica (Hall): Forattini (1971, listed), Forattini (1973, taxonomy), Young & Perkins (1984, taxonomy, distribution), Young & Duncan (1994, keys, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (1999, taxonomy, Mexican distribution), Williams (1999, listed, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2000a, taxonomy, Mexican distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2005a, 2005b, keys), Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal (2010, distribution). Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) diabolica (Hall): Galati (2003, classification, listed), Le Pont et al. (2011, compared with Lutzomyia maesi), Ibáñez-Bernal & Ibarra-Juárez (2016, distribution), Shimabukuro et al. (2017, listed, distribution), Galati (2018, listed, keyed), Durán-Luz et al. (2019, Puebla records), Galati (2021, classification, keys). General distribution. Mexico, United States of America (Young & Perkins 1984; Young & Duncan 1994; Shimabukuro et al. 2017; Galati 2018, 2021). Distribution in Mexico. Chihuahua, Coahuila, Guerrero, Michoacán, Morelos, Nuevo León, Puebla (IbáñezBernal 1999; Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal 2010), Michoacán (Ibáñez-Bernal & Ibarra-Juárez 2016), Puebla (Durán-Luz et al. 2019).

Published as part of Ibáñez-Bernal, Sergio & Durán-Luz, Juana, 2022, An actualized catalogue of the Psychodidae (Diptera) of Mexico and their known distribution by state, pp. 347-408 in Zootaxa 5104 (3) on pages 358-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6332122

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Lutzomyia diabolica, Arthropoda, Lutzomyia, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Psychodidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
1
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!