Views provided by UsageCounts
Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) diabolica (Hall, 1936) diabolicus Hall, 1936: 28 (as Phlebotomus (Brumptomyia )). Localidad tipo: United States of America, Texas, Uvalde. Phlebotomus diabolicus Hall: Lindquist (1936, immature descriptions), Dampf (1938, mention), Floch & Abonnenc (1943, taxonomy), Rozeboom (1944, listed), Addis (1945a, taxonomy), Addis (1945b, key), Packchanian (1946, listed), Barretto (1947, as Flebotomus, catalogue), Fairchild & Hertig (1948a, cf. to gomezi and cruciatus), Thurman et al. (1949, listed), Fairchild & Hertig (1953b, redescription, keys), Vargas & Díaz-Nájera (1953b, Mexican distribution), Quate (1955, keys), Fairchild & Hertig (1959, distribution), Lewis & Garnham (1959, mention), Eads et al. (1965, listed), Quate (1965, listed), Easton et al. (1968, Texas records). Lutzomyia diabolica (Hall): Theodor (1965, classification, listed), Disney (1968, as synonym of L. cruciata), Díaz-Nájera (1971, Coahuila records), Gustafson et al. (1985, mention), Lawyer et al. (1987), Endris et al. (1987), McHugh (1991). Lutzomyia cruciata, not cruciata (Coquillett) (as synonym of L. cruciata): Rosabal & Miller (1970, key), Martins & MoralesFrías (1972, in part, distribution), Young (1972, in part, Texas records), Eads (1978, in part, Texas records), Chaniotis (1978, mention), Martins et al. (1978, catalogue, distribution). Lutzomyia cruciata diabolica (Hall): Lewis (1975a, mouthparts morphology). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) diabolica (Hall): Forattini (1971, listed), Forattini (1973, taxonomy), Young & Perkins (1984, taxonomy, distribution), Young & Duncan (1994, keys, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (1999, taxonomy, Mexican distribution), Williams (1999, listed, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2000a, taxonomy, Mexican distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2005a, 2005b, keys), Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal (2010, distribution). Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) diabolica (Hall): Galati (2003, classification, listed), Le Pont et al. (2011, compared with Lutzomyia maesi), Ibáñez-Bernal & Ibarra-Juárez (2016, distribution), Shimabukuro et al. (2017, listed, distribution), Galati (2018, listed, keyed), Durán-Luz et al. (2019, Puebla records), Galati (2021, classification, keys). General distribution. Mexico, United States of America (Young & Perkins 1984; Young & Duncan 1994; Shimabukuro et al. 2017; Galati 2018, 2021). Distribution in Mexico. Chihuahua, Coahuila, Guerrero, Michoacán, Morelos, Nuevo León, Puebla (IbáñezBernal 1999; Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal 2010), Michoacán (Ibáñez-Bernal & Ibarra-Juárez 2016), Puebla (Durán-Luz et al. 2019).
Published as part of Ibáñez-Bernal, Sergio & Durán-Luz, Juana, 2022, An actualized catalogue of the Psychodidae (Diptera) of Mexico and their known distribution by state, pp. 347-408 in Zootaxa 5104 (3) on pages 358-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6332122
Insecta, Lutzomyia diabolica, Arthropoda, Lutzomyia, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Psychodidae, Taxonomy
Insecta, Lutzomyia diabolica, Arthropoda, Lutzomyia, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Psychodidae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts