Views provided by UsageCounts
Subgenus Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) Galati, 1995 Tricholateralis Galati, 1995: 136 (as subgenus of Lutzomyia). Type species: Phlebotomus cruciatus Coquillett = Lutzomyia cruciata (Coquillett, 1907). Additional references: Galati (2003, listed, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2015, diagnosis), Shimabukuro et al. (2017, listed), Galati (2018, listed, distribution by country, keyed), Galati (2021, classification, keys). Lutzomyia species group Cruciata: Theodor (1965), Martins et al. (1978). Lutzomyia (Helcocyrtomyia) species group Cruciata: Artemiev (1991). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia): Young & Duncan (1994, in part), Ibáñez-Bernal (1999, in part). Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) cruciata (Coquillett, 1907) cruciata Coquillett, 1907: 102 (as Flebotomus cruciatus). Type locality: Guatemala, Alta Vera Paz, Trece Aguas, Cacao. Flebotomus cruciatus Coquillett: Haseman (1907), Galvão & Coutinho (1940, taxonomy), Barretto (1947, catalogue, taxonomic history, distribution). Phlebotomus cruciatus Coquillett: Summers (1913, female), Shannon (1913, feeding habits), Shannon (1926, female), Pinto (1930, female), Costa Lima (1932, male), Pinto (1938, male), Bequaert (1938), Ortiz (1942), Floch & Abonnenc (1943, male), Fairchild (1943), Ortiz (1944), Fairchild & Hertig (1948a, male), Fairchild & Hertig (1953b, male and female), Biagi & Biagi (1953, Mexican distribution, habits, taxonomy), Vargas & Díaz-Nájera (1953b, Mexican distribution), Rosabal (1954, Costa Rica records), Fairchild (1955, listed), Fairchild & Hertig (1959, Central American distribution), Rosabal & Trejos (1964, El Salvador records), Rosabal & Trejos (1965), Biagi et al. (1965, mentioned), Biagi (1966, keys). Phlebotomus (Neophlebotomus) cruciatus Coquillett: Dyar (1929, male and female), Hall (1936, male). Brumptomyia cruciata (Coquillett): Lewis (1965, internal structures, Belize records). Lutzomyia cruciata (Coquillett): Theodor (1965, taxonomy, listed), Williams (1966, Belize transmission), Disney (1968, synonymy), Williams (1970, Belize records), Lewis (1971, listed), Young (1972, Florida records), May-Uc et al. (2011, Quintana Roo records), Pérez et al. (2014, Chiapas records). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) cruciata (Coquillett): Forattini (1971, 1973, taxonomy, distribution), Eads (1978, listed), Martins et al. (1978, in part, distribution), Zeledón et al. (1982, Honduras records), Zeledón & Murillo (1983, Nicaragua records), Le Pont & Desjeux (1983), Young & Perkins (1984, keys, distribution), Murillo & Zeledón (1985), Porter et al. (1987), Endris et al. (1987, egg), Rowton et al. (1991), Young & Duncan (1994, taxonomy, references between 1947 and 1994, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal (1999, diagnosis, references, distribution), Williams (1999, listed, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2000a, taxonomy), Rebollar-Téllez & Manrique-Saide (2001, Yucatán records), Rebollar-Téllez et al. (2004, Campeche records), Ibáñez-Bernal (2005a, 2005b, keys), Rebollar-Téllez et al. (2005, Campeche, abundance data), Rebollar-Téllez et al. (2006, Yucatán records), Pech-May et al. (2010, infection rates in Campeche), Sánchez-García et al. (2010, infection rates in Quintana Roo), González et al. (2011, distribution), Méndez-Pérez & Rebollar-Téllez (2012, morphological studies), Pech-May et al. (2013, population genetics study), Pérez et al. (2014, Chiapas records at coffee plantations). Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) cruciata (Coquillett): Galati (2003, list, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2011, Veracruz records), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2015, Chiapas records), Montes de Oca-Aguilar et al. (2017a, immature characteristics), Montes de Oca-Aguilar et al. (2017b, egg characteristics), Galati (2018, listed, keyed), Adeniran et al., (2019, bar-coding, Quintana Roo), Montes de Oca-Aguilar et al. (2019, morphometry variation), Lozano-Sardaneta et al. (2020, bar-coding, Veracruz), Galati (2021, classification, keys). General distribution. Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, United States of America (Shimabukuro et al. 2017; Galati 2018, 2021). Distribution in Mexico. Campeche, Chiapas, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Yucatán. Additional references: Chiapas (Ibáñez-Bernal et al. 2015), Michoacán (Ibáñez-Bernal & Ibarra-Juárez 2016), Veracruz (IbáñezBernal et al. 2006, 2011), Quintana Roo (May-Uc et al. 2011; Adeniran et al. 2019), Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Tabasco, Veracruz (Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal 2010).
Published as part of Ibáñez-Bernal, Sergio & Durán-Luz, Juana, 2022, An actualized catalogue of the Psychodidae (Diptera) of Mexico and their known distribution by state, pp. 347-408 in Zootaxa 5104 (3) on pages 357-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6332122
Insecta, Arthropoda, Lutzomyia, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Psychodidae, Taxonomy
Insecta, Arthropoda, Lutzomyia, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Psychodidae, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts