Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2022
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) Galati 1995

Authors: Ibáñez-Bernal, Sergio; Durán-Luz, Juana;

Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) Galati 1995

Abstract

Subgenus Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) Galati, 1995 Tricholateralis Galati, 1995: 136 (as subgenus of Lutzomyia). Type species: Phlebotomus cruciatus Coquillett = Lutzomyia cruciata (Coquillett, 1907). Additional references: Galati (2003, listed, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2015, diagnosis), Shimabukuro et al. (2017, listed), Galati (2018, listed, distribution by country, keyed), Galati (2021, classification, keys). Lutzomyia species group Cruciata: Theodor (1965), Martins et al. (1978). Lutzomyia (Helcocyrtomyia) species group Cruciata: Artemiev (1991). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia): Young & Duncan (1994, in part), Ibáñez-Bernal (1999, in part). Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) cruciata (Coquillett, 1907) cruciata Coquillett, 1907: 102 (as Flebotomus cruciatus). Type locality: Guatemala, Alta Vera Paz, Trece Aguas, Cacao. Flebotomus cruciatus Coquillett: Haseman (1907), Galvão & Coutinho (1940, taxonomy), Barretto (1947, catalogue, taxonomic history, distribution). Phlebotomus cruciatus Coquillett: Summers (1913, female), Shannon (1913, feeding habits), Shannon (1926, female), Pinto (1930, female), Costa Lima (1932, male), Pinto (1938, male), Bequaert (1938), Ortiz (1942), Floch & Abonnenc (1943, male), Fairchild (1943), Ortiz (1944), Fairchild & Hertig (1948a, male), Fairchild & Hertig (1953b, male and female), Biagi & Biagi (1953, Mexican distribution, habits, taxonomy), Vargas & Díaz-Nájera (1953b, Mexican distribution), Rosabal (1954, Costa Rica records), Fairchild (1955, listed), Fairchild & Hertig (1959, Central American distribution), Rosabal & Trejos (1964, El Salvador records), Rosabal & Trejos (1965), Biagi et al. (1965, mentioned), Biagi (1966, keys). Phlebotomus (Neophlebotomus) cruciatus Coquillett: Dyar (1929, male and female), Hall (1936, male). Brumptomyia cruciata (Coquillett): Lewis (1965, internal structures, Belize records). Lutzomyia cruciata (Coquillett): Theodor (1965, taxonomy, listed), Williams (1966, Belize transmission), Disney (1968, synonymy), Williams (1970, Belize records), Lewis (1971, listed), Young (1972, Florida records), May-Uc et al. (2011, Quintana Roo records), Pérez et al. (2014, Chiapas records). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) cruciata (Coquillett): Forattini (1971, 1973, taxonomy, distribution), Eads (1978, listed), Martins et al. (1978, in part, distribution), Zeledón et al. (1982, Honduras records), Zeledón & Murillo (1983, Nicaragua records), Le Pont & Desjeux (1983), Young & Perkins (1984, keys, distribution), Murillo & Zeledón (1985), Porter et al. (1987), Endris et al. (1987, egg), Rowton et al. (1991), Young & Duncan (1994, taxonomy, references between 1947 and 1994, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal (1999, diagnosis, references, distribution), Williams (1999, listed, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2000a, taxonomy), Rebollar-Téllez & Manrique-Saide (2001, Yucatán records), Rebollar-Téllez et al. (2004, Campeche records), Ibáñez-Bernal (2005a, 2005b, keys), Rebollar-Téllez et al. (2005, Campeche, abundance data), Rebollar-Téllez et al. (2006, Yucatán records), Pech-May et al. (2010, infection rates in Campeche), Sánchez-García et al. (2010, infection rates in Quintana Roo), González et al. (2011, distribution), Méndez-Pérez & Rebollar-Téllez (2012, morphological studies), Pech-May et al. (2013, population genetics study), Pérez et al. (2014, Chiapas records at coffee plantations). Lutzomyia (Tricholateralis) cruciata (Coquillett): Galati (2003, list, keys), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2011, Veracruz records), Ibáñez-Bernal et al. (2015, Chiapas records), Montes de Oca-Aguilar et al. (2017a, immature characteristics), Montes de Oca-Aguilar et al. (2017b, egg characteristics), Galati (2018, listed, keyed), Adeniran et al., (2019, bar-coding, Quintana Roo), Montes de Oca-Aguilar et al. (2019, morphometry variation), Lozano-Sardaneta et al. (2020, bar-coding, Veracruz), Galati (2021, classification, keys). General distribution. Belize, Brazil, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, United States of America (Shimabukuro et al. 2017; Galati 2018, 2021). Distribution in Mexico. Campeche, Chiapas, Guerrero, Hidalgo, Jalisco, Michoacán, Morelos, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Oaxaca, Puebla, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Tabasco, Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Yucatán. Additional references: Chiapas (Ibáñez-Bernal et al. 2015), Michoacán (Ibáñez-Bernal & Ibarra-Juárez 2016), Veracruz (IbáñezBernal et al. 2006, 2011), Quintana Roo (May-Uc et al. 2011; Adeniran et al. 2019), Chiapas, Guerrero, Michoacán, Nayarit, Oaxaca, Quintana Roo, San Luis Potosí, Tabasco, Veracruz (Godínez-Álvarez & Ibáñez-Bernal 2010).

Published as part of Ibáñez-Bernal, Sergio & Durán-Luz, Juana, 2022, An actualized catalogue of the Psychodidae (Diptera) of Mexico and their known distribution by state, pp. 347-408 in Zootaxa 5104 (3) on pages 357-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5104.3.2, http://zenodo.org/record/6332122

Related Organizations
Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Lutzomyia, Diptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Psychodidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
1
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!