Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Within the BY-COVID project (https://by-covid.org/), a pilot study will be performed to evaluate a simple classification system for data sharing statements of registered clinical studies, characterising the degree of willingness for data sharing, initially and specifically within COVID-19 studies. The evaluation will be performed by 3 experts on a random sample of 200 studies with a data sharing statement in a trial registry, extracted using a search of the metadata repository (MDR, https://crmdr.org/) of ECRIN. The bilateral inter-observer variability between experts will be investigated. In case of disagreement between experts a consensus will be derived to serve as the ‘source of truth’ (so called “gold standard”) for further investigations exploring the use of semi-automatic classification algorithms. Subsequent to the data sharing statement categorisation, the intention is to contact the sponsors and / or principal investigators of those trials that appear likely to provide individual participant data (IPD) and ask whether they would be willing to share IPD in the context of the BY-COVID project.
COVID-19, clinical trials, clinical studies, data sharing statement
COVID-19, clinical trials, clinical studies, data sharing statement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 41 | |
| downloads | 34 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts