Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2021
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Drosophilidae Rondani 1856

Authors: Sforzi, Alessandra; Sommaggio, Daniele;
Abstract

Drosophilidae This worldwide family of acalyptrate flies contains 4,139 species (Evenhuis & Pape 2020) being most speciose in the Hawaiian Islands where more than 600 species are known (N. Evenhuis, per. comm. June 2020). Rondani (1856, 1875d) described two Palaearctic nominal species, Drosophila uvarum Rondani, 1875, considered as a junior synonym, and Domomyza cincta Rondani, 1856, as a senior synonym (but suppressed by the I.C.Z.N.) (Bächli & Rocha Pité 1984, Spencer & Martinez 1987, I.C.Z.N., 1997, Deeming 1988, Bächli et al. 1995, Brake & Bächli 2008). In his paper on the Rondani types at MZUB, Morge (1959b) listed three unpublished names (nomina nuda) of Rondani. Deeming (1988) designated a lectotype for Domomyza cincta and Bächli (1982) designated a lectotype for Drosophila uvarum, both of them in the MZUF. The type material has been recovered for all nominal species and is distributed among the MZUF (two), OUMNH (two) and MZUB (one).

Published as part of Sforzi, Alessandra & Sommaggio, Daniele, 2021, Catalog of the Diptera types described by Camillo Rondani, pp. 1-438 in Zootaxa 4989 (1) on page 108, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4989.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4980621

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Diptera, Animalia, Drosophilidae, Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!