Literature review about the science-journalism relationship

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Project deliverable , Other literature type , Article 31 Dec 2021Publisher:ZenodoFunded by:EC | ENJOI

Authors: de Jong, Anouk; Dijkstra, Anne M.;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6207977 , 10.5281/zenodo.6207978 , 10.5281/zenodo.7472850

Literature review about the science-journalism relationship

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

* New version available * This report describes the first literature review results to develop a robust base for a series of studies within the ENJOI project that explore the science-media relationship. The literature review focuses on the quality and effectiveness of interactions between scientists and media to identify challenges and changes in the science-media relationship. It addresses how collaborations between scientists and media producers can improve accuracy in science communication and how these interactions can be fostered and improved.

ENJOI WP5. Evaluation of ENJOI steps and analysis of the science-media relationship

Related Organizations

University of Twente
Netherlands

Keywords

literature review, science communication, ENJOI, science-media relationship

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	0
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average