Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2014
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Florissantoraphidia Makarkin & Archibald, 2014, gen. nov.

Authors: Makarkin, Vladimir N.; Archibald, S. Bruce;

Florissantoraphidia Makarkin & Archibald, 2014, gen. nov.

Abstract

Genus Florissantoraphidia gen. nov. Type species. Raphidia funerata Engel, 2003. Diagnosis. Moderate-sized raphidiids (forewing ca. 11 mm long); pterostigma long, rather pale, with incorporated branch of RA distinct; distal crossvein 3ra-rp located within pterostigma, far proximad its distal ending. In hind wing, 1r-m long, parallel to R; two doi [one in Archiraphidia]; CuA pectinate, three-branched [onebranched in Archiraphidia, Megaraphidia]. Species included. Two species from Florissant, Florissantoraphidia mortua (Rohwer, 1909) and F. funerata. Etymology. From Florissant, type locality of the type species, and Raphidia, a genus-group name. Remarks. The three-branched pectinate CuA in the hind wing is the most distinctive feature of Florissantoraphidia gen. nov. Within the family, this condition occurs only in single species of the North America genus Agulla; to our knowledge, most other species in this genus normally possess a two-branched CuA as do some species of the Palearctic genera Phaeostigma, Dichrostigma, Harraphidia, and Mongoloraphidia H. Aspöck & U. Aspöck, 1968c. CuA is one-branched in other extant Raphiididae. Florissantoraphidia gen. nov. may be distinguished from Agulla by the following character states: the costal space is narrower; the pterostigma is longer; 3ra-rp is located within the pterostigma [usually just distad pterostigma (very rarely in distal part of pterostigma) in Agulla]; the basal 1r-m in the hind wing is long, running nearly parallel to RA [short, crossvein-like, inclined to RA at some angle in Agulla]. The only known fossil species of Agulla is A. mineralensis known from a single hind wing, whose characters agree well with Agulla. We consider it likely that ‘ Agulla ’ protomaculata from the Early Eocene Green River Formation does not belong to this genus, however (Archibald & Makarkin, ongoing research). Some doubt remains as to the distinctiveness of the two species included here in the new genus, as differences present in their known fossils might possibly be intraspecific. We prefer to leave these separate, however, until future fossils may clarify this question.

Published as part of Makarkin, Vladimir N. & Archibald, S. Bruce, 2014, A revision of the late Eocene snakeflies (Raphidioptera) of the Florissant Formation, Colorado, with special reference to the wing venation of the Raphidiomorpha, pp. 401-444 in Zootaxa 3784 (4) on page 432, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3784.4.4, http://zenodo.org/record/252218

Keywords

Insecta, Arthropoda, Florissantoraphidia, Raphidioptera, Animalia, Biodiversity, Raphidiidae, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 2
  • 2
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
2