Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2016
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pseudopyrochroa depressa Pic

Authors: Young, Daniel K.; Hsiao, Yun;

Pseudopyrochroa depressa Pic

Abstract

Pseudopyrochroa depressa (Pic) (Figures 1–6) Description of mature larva. The single, relatively intact mature larva (probably on the small side of the average based on reared adults males) measures 17.5 mm (mesal labral apex to apices of urogomphi) and width (across widest portion of eighth abdominal segment) of 2.5 mm. Body orthosomatic with sides subparallel; moderately sclerotized except much of cranium, mandibles, and urogomphal plate more heavily sclerotized; body vestiture consisting of short to moderately elongate, scattered setae. Thoracic and abdominal terga 1–9 lacking distinct parabasal ridges. Head and body creamy-yellowish to amber, melanization much darker in areas of heavy sclerotization such as tips of mandibles, urogomphi, urogomphal lip and urogomphal pits. Head: Prognathous, flattened, exerted from prothorax. Epicranial suture lyriform (Fig. 1) with stem short, frontal arms complete nearly to antennal insertions; endocarinae absent. Symmetrical labrum anterad fused frontoclypeal region. Four stemmata on each side of head in 2 groups of 2, lower pair parallel with antennal insertions. Antennal insertions fully exposed, antennae presumably filiform, 3-segmented (Figs. 1-2; incomplete in single larva; not intact on two exuviae). Mouthparts (Fig. 2) retracted. Mandibles heavily sclerotized, movable, asymmetrical, molar area of mandibles well-developed, left mandible bearing a prominent molar tooth; apex of right mandible distinctly tridentate, left mandible bidentate, both bearing 1-2 smaller subapical teeth. Maxillae each with 1-segmented cardo which is diagonally folded anteriorly upon itself toward the stipes and thus appearing 2-segmented; a well-developed, undivided, pad-like maxillary articulating area (Fig. 2); ventral surface of stipes with dense, largely double row of stout setae mesad palpifer along adoral margin (Figs. 2–3); galea and lacinia fused to form maxillary mala; mala bearing stout apical and adoral setae and spinose-dentiform uncus at apicoadoral margin (Fig. 3), three, stout, elongate-spatulate setae associated with uncus; 3-segmented, filiform maxillary palpus [3rd palpomere missing in Fig. 3], 2nd palpomere about 1.5X length of first, 3rd palpomere 0.8X length of 2nd, 3rd palpomere tapering distally, acutely rounded apically. Labium (Fig. 2) with mentum ovate-subquadrate, submentum elongate with sides shallowly sinuate basally, apical margin slightly more heavily sclerotized, convexly rounded; well-developed, elongate ligula; each labial palpus short, 2-segmented. Hypopharyngeal sclerome well-developed, heavily sclerotized, molar-like, transverse; proximal region of hypopharynx with setal brushes. Hypostomal rods (Fig. 2) well developed, divergent; gular sutures separate. Thorax and Abdomen: Thoracic segmentation well developed, sides parallel; cervicosternum divided into three plates. Legs well-developed, moderately short, 5-segmented including tarsungulus, vestiture consisting of sparse, short setae; coxae large, separated by 2–3 coxal diameters. Abdomen flattened, moderately sclerotized, tergites 1–7 Fig. 2: cranium, ventral view Fig. 3: distal left maxilla, ventral view FIGURES 1–6. (Continued) Fig. 4: abdominal segments 8–9, dorsal view Fig. 5: abdominal segments 8–9, ventral view Fig. 6: distal urogomphal plate: urogomphal pits, ventral view. subequal in length and width; 8th tergite approximately 2X length of 7th. Sternite 8 emarginate apically. Tergite 9 (Fig. 4) hinged, capable of considerable dorso-longitudinal movement, extending ventrally, thus forming the urogomphal plate (Figs. 4–5), widest basally where it forms well developed lateral lobes, lobes acutely rounded apically; surface of urogomphal plate bearing numerous, well-developed callosities and several larger, dorsal and lateral setigerous calli on the dorsal and lateral urogomphal surfaces; urogomphi heavily sclerotized, long, slender, subparallel, tapering and acuminate apically; ventral surface of urogomphal plate shallowly, but sharply excavate basally at articulation with 9th sternite, excavation narrowing distally to bases of urogomphi. Urogomphal plate possessing a heavily sclerotized, mesally acutely produced urogomphal lip ventrally, between the two, heavily sclerotized, shallow urogomphal pits (Fig. 6), which, in turn, arise distally between the heavily sclerotized, fixed urogomphi; urogomphal pits bearing characteristic, parallel rugae (Fig. 6). Sternite 9 (Fig. 6) broadly, transversely U-shaped, divided mesally by weak, desclerotized line, partially recessed into shallow emargination of 8th sternite, possessing continuous semicircular arch of approximately 28–30 well-developed asperites along anterior margin. Tenth segment reduced, crescentiform, basal margin rounded, recessed into emargination of 9th sternite, visible ventrally. Spiracles: One pair of well-developed, ovate thoracic spiracles, situated ventro-laterally on laterotergite along anterior margin of mesothorax. Paired, ovate abdominal spiracles, subequal in size, located on dorsolateral margin of 1st abdominal tergite and ventrolateral margins of abdominal laterotergites 2–7; paired spiracles of abdominal laterotergite 8 (Fig. 6) slightly larger, annular-ovate, located ventrolaterally at distal 1/3 of its length. Material Examined. [2 adult ♂♂]: TAIWAN: Miaoli Hsien // Syuejian; ca. 1900m // 24.424625°N / 121.013511°E // 29 January 2015 // Yun Hsiao, leg.; [2nd label]: Reared from larva ex: // beneath bark (exposed // surfaces) of decaying logs; // humidity moderate; [3rd label]: Pseudopyrochroa // depressa ♂ // Pic // det. D. K. Young. [2 vials, one each for exuviae from last larval instars of reared adults]: [data as above but on single, EtOHformatted label]; [additional data on EtOH label in vials]: ASSOCIATED ADULT IN // PINNED COLLECTION; [2nd label]: Pseudopyrochroa // depressa ♂ // Pic // det. D. K. Young. [1 mature larva]: [same data as EtOHformatted data labels, above]; [additional label in vial]: Pseudopyrochroa // depressa // Pic // det. D. K. Young. Diagnosis. The structure of the apico-adoral surface of the maxillae has been shown to be somewhat diagnostic at the species level in larvae of Pseudopyrochroa (Hayashi 1969, Young 1996b, 2001). The three, stout, elongatespatulate setae associated with the uncus (Fig. 3) are unique among the three currently known Pseudopyrochroa larvae from Taiwan. Also diagnostic are structures associated with the ninth abdominal segment. The structure of the urogomphal plate has consistently been very useful and reliable for species recognition of a wide range of pyrochroid larvae (e.g., Young 1975, 1991, 1996b, Young et al. 2016, Hayashi 1969). The most diagnostically useful characters of P. depressa larvae are the elongate, slender, subparallel urogomphi (Figs. 4–5), the mesally acutely produced urogomphal lip, and shallow urogomphal pits with characteristic parallel rows of rugae (Figs. 4–6). Among other known Taiwanese pyrochroid larvae (Young et al. 2016), those of P. fainanensis also have a prominent urogomphal lip (Fig. 7), but it is broadly rounded, the sub-ovate urogomphal pits are more developed, and the urogomphi are strongly incurved with recurved apices. The heavily sclerotized, long, slender, subparallel, tapering, and apically acuminate urogomphi of P. carinifrons (Fig. 8) are quite similar to those of P. depressa. However, the acutely produced urogomphal lip and shallow urogomphal pits of P. depressa (Figs. 5–6) easily separate larvae of the two species. Natural history. On 29 January 2015, three larvae of P. depressa, two live and one dead, were collected (YH) at an elevation of 1900 meters in Miaoli Hsien (24.424625°N / 121.013511°E). The larvae were found beneath bark of dead logs, from exposed surfaces of logs. The humidity of the site was relatively moderate, drier than that associated with collections of P. carinifrons and P. fainanensis larvae (Young et al. 2016). The two live larvae were successfully reared to the adult stage; one emerged on 16 February 2015.

Published as part of Young, Daniel K. & Hsiao, Yun, 2016, Description of the mature larva of Pseudopyrochroa depressa (Pic) (Coleoptera: Pyrochroidae: Pyrochroinae), with comparison to other Taiwanese Pseudopyrochroa, pp. 189-195 in Zootaxa 4175 (2) on pages 190-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4175.2.7, http://zenodo.org/record/257027

Keywords

Coleoptera, Pyrochroidae, Insecta, Arthropoda, Pseudopyrochroa, Animalia, Biodiversity, Pseudopyrochroa depressa, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 5
  • 5
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
5