Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2020
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Actinopus castelo, sp. nov.

Authors: Miglio, Laura Tavares; Pérez-Miles, Fernando; Bonaldo, Alexandre B.;
Abstract

Actinopus castelo sp. nov. Figs 10–12, Map 1 Type material. BRAZIL. Holotype male from 05º 13’ 48.8” S 41º 41’ 59.0” W, Fazenda Bonito, ECB Rochas Ornamentais, Castelo do Piauí, Piauí, Brazil, 12.ii.2006, F. S. Rodrigues leg. (MPEG 22277). Paratypes: BRAZIL. Piauí: Castelo do Piauí, ECB Rochas Ornamentais, Fazenda Bonito, Plot Cerrado Rupestre, 05º 13’ 48.8” S 41º 41’ 59.0” W, 10♂, 12.ii.2006, F. S. Rodrigues leg. (MPEG 2400, 1 ♂ removed for SEM); Plot Campo Sujo, 05º 14’ 07.1” S 41º 41’ 16.3” W, 9♂, 10.ii.2006, F. S. Rodrigues leg. (MPEG 2399); Caracol, Parque Nacional da Serra das Confusıes, Plote PPBio Semiárido, 09° 13’ 16” S 43° 29’ 21” W, 1♂, x.2006, P. R. R. Silva et al. leg. (CHNUFPI 202). Bahia: Paulo Afonso, Estaç „o Ecológica Raso da Catarina, 09° 39’ 58.1” S 38° 28’ 15.1” W, 4♂, 22–23.v.2012, I. L. F. Magalh „es & J. L. Chavari leg. (UFMG 11681); 5♂, 22–23. V.2012, I. L. F. Magalhães & J. L. Chavari leg. (IBSP 162680). Etymology. The specific name is an noun in apposition derived from the type locality name. Diagnosis. Males of A. castelo differ from those of all other species of the genus, except A. tarsalis (Fig. 9 A–C, see Miglio et al., 2012, figs 1–12), by the copulatory bulb without BTA and by the robust embolar base, inserted basally at a right angle (90°); embolar apex flattened and expanded, arrow-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 12 A–C). They differ from those of A. tarsalis by the PAc developed in prolateral view of embolus, tegulum thinner, PA less conspicuous and by the presence of a large scutum covering almost all the dorsal surface of abdomen (Fig. 10 A). MALE (MPEG 22277): Total length 9.75; Carapace, long 5.25; wide 5.12. Carapace anterior part tapering. Anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior row recurved (Fig. 10 B). With five short bristles between AME and clypeus; two bristles between ALEALP and many short and weak bristles between posterior eyesfovea and lateral eyes-edge of carapace. Sternum with eight sigilla fused medially, two distal sigilla more fused than others (Fig. 10 C). Rastellum protuberant, inverted V-shaped, hirsute, without spines in apex (Fig. 10 E, F). Chelicerae with nine denticles along prolateral row of teeth. Prolateral row with five megateeth. Retrolateral row with six megateeth (Fig. 10 D). Patella and tibia III with distal crown of well-developed thorns, on two articles, interrupted in middle (Fig. 11 A, B). Patellae III and IV with spines on prolaterodorsal face (Fig. 11 A, C). Tibia IV without spines on dorsal surface and with two visible rows of trichobothria (Fig. 11 D). Ventral pseudoscopulae occupies 50% of tarsus I, 40% of II and 100% of III and IV. Pseudoscopula on tarsi I and II with setae spaced, forming diffuse group of bristles; on tarsi III and IV, compact. Carapace, chelicerae, sternum, coxae, trochanters, femora, patellae, tibiae, metatarsi and tarsi yellowish-brown; Abdomen pale brown (Fig. 9 A). Eyes: Diameters: PME 0.12, PLE 0.20, ALE 0.24, AME 0.28; MOQ: Length 0.72, front width 2.36, back width 2,00; Interdistances: PME–PME 1.28, PLE–PME 0.16, AME–AME 0.16, ALE–AME 0.44, ALE–PLE 0.36, AME–PME 0.44. Ocular area: OAL 11.63, OAW 8.13, and IF 1.75. Body: Clypeus: 0.25; Fovea: 2.13; labium: long 1.13; wide 1.00; Chelicerae: long 2.375; wide 1.625; sternum: long 3.5; wide 2.875. Abdomen: long 4.75; wide 3.75. Leg measurements: I: Fe 5.625/ Pa 1.625/ Ti 3.625/ Me 4.625/ Ta 2.75/ total 18.25. II: 5.25/ 2.25/ 3.25/ 4.75/ 2.75/ 18.25. III: 4.125 / 2.375 / 2.5/ 4.625 / 2.875 / 16.5. IV: 5.625/ 2.625/ 4.875/ 5.375/ 2.625/ 21.125. Formula 4123. Spination: I—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0-0-1, d0, p0, r0; ti v2-4-6, d0, p0, r0-4-6; Me v9-14-12, d0, p2-2-2, r1- 4-3; ta v6-10-15, d0, p1-1-2, r3-5-7. II—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0-0-1, d0, p0, r0; ti v1-4-5, d0, p0, r0-4-6; Me v4-12-11, d0, p0-0-4, r4-2-3; ta v7-8-9, d0, p0-3-3, r2- 4-7. III—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d11-14-25, p0, r0-0- 3; ti v0-0-4, d1-0-14, p0-0-2, r0-0-3; Me v0-4-6, d2-2- 1, p3-2-4, r4-5-7; ta v0, d0, p2-3-5, r2-4-5; IV—Fe v0, d0, p0, r0; Pa v0, d21-14-6, p0, r0; ti v0-0-4, d0, p0, r0; Me v7-8-11, d0, p1-1-2, r0-0-1; ta v0, d0, p0-2-5, r0-1-1. Palp: PA well developed, embolus with three small keels (PAc, PI and PS); keels evident in dorsal and prolateral views, barely visible retrolaterally. BTA absent; prolateral tegulum serrated next to base of embolus and big swelling on tegulum surface, in same direction of PA, but more dorsally (Fig. 12 A–C). Distribution. BRAZIL. Piauí: Castelo do Piauí and Caracol. Bahia: Paulo Afonso (Map 1).

Published as part of Miglio, Laura Tavares, Pérez-Miles, Fernando & Bonaldo, Alexandre B., 2020, Taxonomic Revision of the Spider Genus Actinopus Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Mygalomorphae, Actinopodidae), pp. 1-256 in Megataxa 2 (1) on pages 16-18, DOI: 10.11646/megataxa.2.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5597237

Keywords

Arthropoda, Actinopus, Actinopodidae, Arachnida, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Actinopus castelo, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 28
    download downloads 1
  • 28
    views
    1
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
28
1
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!