Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Aim and objectives: To determine the role of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in general dental practice and to study the response of the general dental practitioners regarding the utility and versatility of CBCT. Methodology: Following a pilot study, a self-structured questionnaire comprising of 20 questions was given to 200 general dental practitioners in Chennai. Each questionnaire was collected in a ballet box and was individually evaluated. Statistical analysis: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, T test and Chi-Square were performed. Results: Males were predominant within the age group of 20-30yrs with >5yrs of experience. 57.5% of dental practice belongs to middle class, followed by 23.5% and 19% in upper class and lower class group respectively. On asking for request for CBCT, 58.5% participants request for a CBCT in their practice and among them 23% request for implants and impactions cases. 42% of dentists have difficulty in interpreting a CBCT image. 33% of the participants agreed that CBCT gives 3D reconstructive images and has got excellent hard tissue resolution, hence very accurate and reliable in dental diagnosis. 79% of the participants have not attended any training programs on CBCT. 100% of the participants were willing to update their knowledge, attend seminars and workshops on CBCT if provided with opportunities. Conclusion: In the present study, majority of the participants believed that CBCT is a useful diagnostic tool in dentistry and research. Regular continuing education programs, workshops, meetings and seminars are required to update dentists’ knowledge on CBCT.
Cone beam computed tomography, dental education, knowledge, attitude, radiology, cross sectional imaging, questionnaire, radiation, utility, versatility
Cone beam computed tomography, dental education, knowledge, attitude, radiology, cross sectional imaging, questionnaire, radiation, utility, versatility
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 5 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts