{"references": ["Abraham, M. (2004). \"'Joint venture' oder 'feindliche \u00dcbernahme'-Niklas Luhmanns Religionstheorie und die Theologie\", NZTSTh, Bd. Walter de Gruyter, 387-422.", "Alver, F. (2006). \"Niklas Luhmann\", Kadife Karanl\u0131k 2, Ayna \u015e\u00f6valyeleri i\u00e7inde Su Yay\u0131nevi, \u0130stanbul, 141-171.", "Berger, P. L. (2000). Kutsal \u015eemsiye, Dinin Sosyolojik Teorisinin Ana Unsurlar\u0131, \u00c7ev. Ali Co\u015fkun, 2. Bask\u0131, Ra\u011fbet Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul.", "Bodur, H.E. (2005). \"Sosyolojik Din Teorisi ve T\u00fcrk Din Sosyolojisi\", T\u00fcrk Din Sosyolojisinin Temel Sorunlar\u0131 Sempozyumu\", Gazi \u00dcniversitesi \u00c7orum \u0130lahiyat Fak\u00fcltesi Yay\u0131n\u0131, \u00c7orum, 75-88.", "Co\u015ftu, Y. (2003). \"Homojenlik ve Heterojenlik Aras\u0131nda K\u00fcreselle\u015fme-Din \u0130li\u015fkisi\", \u0130slamiyat, VI, say\u0131 2, 67-76.", "\u00c7i\u011fdem, A. (1997). Bir \u0130mkan Olarak Modernite-Weber ve Habermas, \u0130leti\u015fim Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul.", "Dahm, K.-W. (1975). Das Jenseits der Gesellschaft, \"Gesellschaftliche Bestimmung von Unbestimmbaren: Niklas Luhmann\", Cladius Verlag, M\u00fcnchen, 269-279.", "D\u00f6bert, R. (1973). Systemtheorie und die Entwicklung religi\u00f6ser Deutungssysteme-Zur Logik des sozialwissenschaftlichen Funktionalismus, Erste Auflage, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.", "Erdem, F.-J. \u00d6zen (2003). \"Niklas Luhmann'\u0131n Tan\u0131d\u0131kl\u0131k, Emin Olma ve G\u00fcven Ay\u0131r\u0131m\u0131\", Sosyal Bilimlerde G\u00fcven, Ed. Ferda Erdem, Vadi Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, Ankara, 53-59.", "Fritsch, M. (2003). \"Religon im System\", Orientierung, Nr. 11 67. Jahrgang, Z\u00fcrich, 15 Juni, 126-131.", "Habermas, J. (1998). \"Niklas Luhmann'la Bir Tart\u0131\u015fma (1971): Toplumun Sistem Kuram\u0131 m\u0131, Ele\u015ftirel Toplum Kuram\u0131 m\u0131?\", Sosyal Bilimlerin Mant\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00dczerine, \u00c7ev. Mustafa T\u00fczel, Kabalc\u0131 Yay\u0131nevi, \u0130stanbul, 381-518.", "Helmstetter, R. (2005). \"Einen Unterschied kann man nicht anbeten: Luhmanns Systemtheorie als negative theologie?\", http://iasl.uni-muenchen.de/[15.09.2005].", "Kaufmann, F.-X.(1989). Religion und Modernit\u00e4t, Sozialwissenscahftliche Perspektiven, J.C.B Mohr (Paul Siebeck) T\u00fcbingem.", "Kehrer, G. (1988). Einf\u00fchrung in die Religionssoziologie, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.", "Kern, T.(1997). Zeichen und Wunder, Enthuastische Glaubensformen in der modernen Gesellschaft, Europ\u00e4ischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main.", "King, M. (2000). Avrupa'da M\u00fcsl\u00fcmanlar: \u0130slam \u0130\u00e7in Yeni Bir Kimlik, \u00c7ev. A.Ta\u015ftan, La\u00e7in, Kayseri.", "Kirman, M.A. (2005). Din ve Sek\u00fclerle\u015fme, Karahan K\u0130tabevi, Adana.", "Knoblauch, H. (1999). Religionssoziologie, Sammlung G\u00f6schen, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.", "K\u00f6kta\u015f, M.E.( 1993). T\u00fcrkiye'de Dini Hayat, \u0130\u015faret Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul.", "Krech, V. (1999). Religionssoziologie, Transcripte Verlag, Bielefeld.", "Lehmann, M. (2005). \"Die Konfirmation der Differenz, Niklas Luhmanns Religionstheorie,\" Vortrag im Systemtheoretischen Kolloqium der MLU Halle, 1/01, http://www.soziologie.uni-halle.de/lehmann/texte.html [24.01.2005].", "Luhmann, N. (1972). \"Die Organiserbarkeit von Religionen und Kirchen\", Religion im Umbruch, Herausgegeben: J. W\u00f6ssner, Ferdnand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 245-285.", "Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems, Tr. John Bednarz, Jr., with Dirk Baecker, Stanford University Pres, Stanford, California.", "Luhmann, N. (1996). Funktion der Religion, 4. Aufl. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.", "Luhmann, N. (1998). \"Religion als Kommunikation\", Religion als Kommunikation, Hartmann Tyrell, Volkhard Krech und Hubert Knoblauch (Hrsg), Ergon Verlag, W\u00fcrzburg, 135-145.", "Luhmann, N. (2002a). Die Religion der Gesellschaft, Erste Auflage, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.", "Luhmann, N. (2002b). Refah Devletlerinin Siyaset Teorisi, \u00c7ev. Medeni Beyazta\u015f, Bak\u0131\u015f Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, \u0130stanbul.", "\u00d6zdemir, C. (2001). \"Neofonksiyonalizm\", Osman Gazi \u00dcniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 81.", "\u00d6zdemir, C. (2000). Fonksiyonalizmden Neofonksiyonalizme: Klasik Teorilerin Yeniden \u0130n\u015fas\u0131, Hacettepe \u00dcniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc.", "Sar\u0131bay, A. Y. (2005). Hukuk Felsefesi ve Sosyal Felsefe, \"Hukuk ve Politika: Luhmann Sosyolojisi Ba\u011flam\u0131nda Bir Tart\u0131\u015fma\" (http://www.ivrturkey.org/ays.htm-[12.10.2005]).", "Yolda\u015f, Y. (2004). \u0130\u015flevsel-Yap\u0131sal Sistem Kuram\u0131, Roma Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, Ankara.", "http://www.systemische-beratung.de/systemtheorie.htm#Systemisches Denken \u2013 heute[15.09.205].", "http://www.berndporr.me.uk/luhmann3/node5.html[14.02.2006."]}

Bu makalede sistem teorisinin önemli temsilcisi Niklas Luhmann'ın din teorisi ve sosyolojik din yaklaşımları ele alınmıştır. Luhmann'ın din sosyolojisi, sistem teorisinde dinin nasıl ele alındığını ortaya koymaktadır. Oldukça soyut bir çerçevede işlenen teoride dinin tarihsel formlarının eksikliği hissedilmektedir. Sistem teorisinin din yaklaşımlarında en önemli sorun, insanın özne olarak bulunmayışıdır. Luhmann bu sorunu psişik sistem yaklaşımıyla aşmaya çalışır; ancak onun genel sistem perspektifinden dolayı, sosyal iletişim diline indirge-nemeyen dindarlığın çeşitli boyutlarında teorik ve pratik sorunlarla karşı karşıyadır.Neo-Classical Sociology of Religion: Religion as a System in the Thought of Niklas LuhmannIn this article, theory of religion and approaches of sociological religion of Niklas Luhmann who is an important representative of system theory will be handled. Niklas Luhmann's sociology of religion puts forward how to evaluate religion as a system. Lack of historical forms of any religion is seen in this theory which is studied in so abstract concept. The most important question of this system theory on the approach of religion is not accepting the human as a subject. Niklas Luhmann tries to solve this question with the method of psychical system; however, because of his general perspective of system, it comes face to face with some theoretical and practical gaps or questions in the non-organizational dimension of religious experience which cannot be reduced to language of social communication.https://www.marife.org/marife/article/view/372

Atıf / Cite as: Çelik, Celaleddin. "Neoklasik Din Sosyolojisi: Niklas Luhmann'da Sistem Olarak Din". Marife 7/1 (2007): 193-219. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3343805.