Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Beyond Search Engine Optimization (SEO): How Large Language Models (LLMs) Are Redefining Surgeon Visibility

Authors: Thomas Sorenson; Carter Boyd; Kshipra Hemal; Oriana Cohen; Mihye Choi; Nolan Karp;

Beyond Search Engine Optimization (SEO): How Large Language Models (LLMs) Are Redefining Surgeon Visibility

Abstract

PURPOSE: Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are rapidly reshaping how patients identify and evaluate surgeons, representing the most significant shift in digital patient discovery since the rise of search engines. Historically, surgeon visibility has depended on search engine optimization (SEO), which prioritizes keyword matching, backlinks, and website performance. However, LLMs function as conversational recommendation systems that synthesize information across multiple sources to generate narrative, context-sensitive guidance. This study aims to describe how LLMs generate surgeon recommendations, contrast this process with traditional SEO-based discovery, and identify factors that may influence surgeon visibility in AI-mediated environments. METHODS: A narrative, conceptual analysis was performed examining the information-retrieval and recommendation mechanisms of widely used LLM platforms. Existing SEO frameworks were compared with LLM-based recommendation behavior, with particular attention to how signals such as academic affiliation, peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reputation, educational content quality, and cross-source consistency are incorporated. Practical implications for surgeon visibility were synthesized from current AI behavior and emerging digital health communication trends. RESULTS: LLMs differ fundamentally from search engines by deprioritizing traditional SEO signals such as keyword density and backlinks. Instead, LLMs emphasize synthesized indicators of expertise, including academic and institutional credibility, peer-reviewed publications, authoritative educational writing, and consistency across trusted sources. As a result, conventional SEO strategies alone may be insufficient to ensure surgeon visibility within AI-generated recommendations. Surgeons with strong academic footprints and high-quality, credible online content are more likely to be surfaced in LLM-mediated patient inquiries. CONCLUSION: LLMs are redefining surgeon discoverability by shifting patient information-seeking from link-based searches to narrative, recommendation-driven interactions. This transition necessitates a reassessment of traditional digital marketing strategies in favor of approaches that emphasize credibility, scholarship, and educational authority. Surgeons who adapt to this emerging AI-driven paradigm may be better positioned for visibility and patient trust as generative AI becomes increasingly integrated into healthcare decision-making.

Abstract ID: CP10

Related Organizations
Keywords

PSRC 2026, conference abstract, plastic surgery, reconstructive surgery

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average