Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison of Fenton Vs Intergrowth-21st Charts in Assessing Postnatal Growth In Preterm Babies in a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors: Dr Haritha Hari Sanakr , Dr Prajitha Sasidharan , Dr B Ravichander , Dr Manoj R M;

Comparison of Fenton Vs Intergrowth-21st Charts in Assessing Postnatal Growth In Preterm Babies in a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is a major contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality, especially in rural India where resources are limited. Growth monitoring is essential for timely interventions. The Fenton 2013 growth charts and INTERGROWTH-21st standards differ in methodology and classification, potentially influencing management decisions. This study aimed to compare both the charts in post-natal assessment of preterm babies. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from 2022–2024 at a rural tertiary hospital, including 200 preterm infants (28–36 weeks gestation). Anthropometric parameters (weight, length, head circumference) were recorded from birth to 6 months corrected age and converted to Z-scores using both charts. Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) was defined as <10th percentile. Concordance was assessed using Kappa statistics. Results: Most infants (55%) weighed 1.5–2.5 kg at birth; 85% were moderate to late preterm. Fenton charts consistently classified more infants as EUGR compared to INTERGROWTH-21st, particularly in weight. Concordance between charts ranged from moderate to substantial (Kappa 0.45–0.72). Significant discrepancies were observed primarily below the 10th percentile. Conclusion: Growth chart choice substantially impacts preterm growth classification. Fenton charts may overestimate EUGR, risking overtreatment; INTERGROWTH-21st offers a more conservative approach. In resource limited settings, a balanced application of both charts may optimize clinical care and resource allocation.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average