
This paper investigates different machine learning methods for identifying deceptive SMS spam.It is quite difficult to detect evasive spam communications because they use obfuscation to bypass typical filters. Some of the models that were assessed were Deep Learning, Naïve Bayes, Decision Trees, and Support Vector Machines. Included in the compilation are preprocessed messages that are either spam or ham originating from real sources. When comparing results, F1-score, recall, accuracy, and precision are given as appraisal metrics. The results of the experiment highlight the advantages and disadvantages of each paradigm. Deep learning models are superior to more conventional methods when dealing with patterns of varying complexity.To make detection better, we need to augment the data and develop the features. Several recommendations for enhancing spam detection models are included in the article. Modifications to the model will be implemented in the future to address the evolving tactics employed by spammers.
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Evasive Spam, SMS Spam Detection, Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, Spam Filtering, Text Classification, Naïve Bayes, Feature Engineering
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Evasive Spam, SMS Spam Detection, Support Vector Machines, Decision Trees, Spam Filtering, Text Classification, Naïve Bayes, Feature Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
