Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2004
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2004
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2004
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Methodological Evaluation of Community Health Centre Systems in Ethiopia Using Difference-in-Differences Approach to Assess Reliability

Authors: Desta, Fasil; Abeba, Mekdes; Asfaw, Seresignew;

Methodological Evaluation of Community Health Centre Systems in Ethiopia Using Difference-in-Differences Approach to Assess Reliability

Abstract

Community health centers (CHCs) in Ethiopia play a crucial role in providing primary healthcare services to rural and underserved populations. The reliability of these systems is essential for ensuring effective service delivery, but there is limited evidence on how CHC systems can be reliably evaluated. A Difference-in-Differences model was employed to analyse pre- and post-intervention data from CHCs across different regions in Ethiopia. Data on patient flow, resource allocation, and staff performance were collected using a standardised questionnaire. Robust standard errors were used to account for potential heterogeneity. The analysis revealed significant improvements in patient wait times and resource utilization post-intervention, with a reduction of approximately 20% in average waiting periods (mean = 35 minutes). The DiD model demonstrated high reliability and validity in measuring system changes over time. The findings suggest that CHCs can be effectively monitored for service improvements. Future research should consider longitudinal data collection to further validate the DiD methodology's applicability and reliability across different settings. community health centers, Ethiopia, Difference-in-Differences, healthcare systems evaluation, robust standard errors

Related Organizations
Keywords

Outcome Evaluation, Difference-in-Differences, Ethiopia, Geographic Medicine, Community Health Centers, Public Health Systems, Randomized Controlled Trials

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average