Downloads provided by UsageCounts
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17978
With the aim of an empirical scientometric case study of information science institutes in Graz (Austria), a publication analysis was held based on the methodological approach of Friedländer (2014) and Hilbert et al. (2015), namely the use of comprehensive (personal or institutional) publication lists instead of applying data from commercial information services (like Web of Science, Scopus or Google Scholar). We determined and analyzed the publications for three institutes in Graz in terms of their productivity (publication output), impact (coverage and citation count) and topics (based on the publication’s titles).
Scientific institution, Informetrics, Publication list, Scientometric analysis, Topical analysis
Scientific institution, Informetrics, Publication list, Scientometric analysis, Topical analysis
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 21 | |
| downloads | 13 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts