
11. Kalanchoe prolifera (Bowie ex Hooker 1859: t. 5147) Hamet (1907: 881) (Fig. 10). Type:— Hort. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1857, Madagascar, s.c. s.n. (lectotype K barcode K000232802), lectotype designated by Figueiredo & Smith (2018: 24). Iconography:— Hooker (1859), Figueiredo & Smith (2018: 24), Walters et al. (2011: 247–248). Secondary distribution:— Spain = cited by Randall (2017). [Also in Australia, Macaronesia (La Palma, Gran Canaria), South Africa] Notes:— Smith & Monro (2024) showed that the name K. prolifera was validly published by Hamet (1907: 881) and not by Hamet (1908: 19).
Published as part of Gallo, Lorenzo & Smith, Gideon F., 2024, A review of the genus Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae) in the Euro-Mediterranean area, with an annotated catalogue and identification key, pp. 171-198 in Phytotaxa 674 (2) on page 185, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.674.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/14521152
Kalanchoe, Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Biodiversity, Plantae, Crassulaceae, Saxifragales, Kalanchoe prolifera, Taxonomy
Kalanchoe, Tracheophyta, Magnoliopsida, Biodiversity, Plantae, Crassulaceae, Saxifragales, Kalanchoe prolifera, Taxonomy
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
