
The aim of this thesis is to argue against achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) revolvingaround (i) programs being insufficient to create humanlike intelligence due to their lack ofsemantic grasping and (ii) our inability to effectively model complex systems. The challenge ismagnified by our struggles to mathematically explain basic complex phenomena, raising doubtsabout our capability to replicate intricate structures like human intelligence or vertebrate brains.Attaining AGI requires transcending the limitations of current mathematical and computationalparadigms, with a call for a revolutionary leap in both areas. Despite these challenges, replicatingnonhuman intelligence, even if encountered, remains unfeasible due to complexities beyond ourcurrent capabilities. Overall, achieving AGI presents an immensely challenging prospect for theforeseeable future.
Computational intelligence, Artificial intelligence, Philosophy, Modern philosophy, Contemporary philosophy, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion
Computational intelligence, Artificial intelligence, Philosophy, Modern philosophy, Contemporary philosophy, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
