Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2024
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah (BPRS) Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Studi pada BPRS di Kota Semarang yang Terdaftar di OJK Periode 2019-2022)

Authors: Miranda, Ariadna Madyaratri; Wirman, Wirman;

Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah (BPRS) Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Studi pada BPRS di Kota Semarang yang Terdaftar di OJK Periode 2019-2022)

Abstract

Apart from providing loan funds for the community, health level of BPRS also needs to be considered so that they can carry out their roles and functions well. A poor level of health will have a negative impact on the performance and management of the bank and can endanger other parties such as customers who have entrusted their funds to be managed. To assess the level of health or good or bad performance of bank, it can be assessed using several indicator. Bank Indonesia uses the RBRR approach as a replacement for the previous method which was less effective. The research method used is descriptive quantitative. The data used is secondary data in the form of BPRS financial reports which can be accessed on the official website http://www.ojk.go.id. The result of the research show that based on the RGEC analysis that has been carried out at the BPRS in Semarang City, it categorized as healthy with PK value of 2, which means it classified as healthy so it is able to overcome all negative influences but there are still weaknesses that should be immediately acted upon or overcome.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Bank Health Level, Sharia Rural Bank, RGEC Method

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!