
The present paper has tried to investigate and give answers, statements and analyze the doubts related to Art. 2 TEU. However, the way is difficult given that Art. 2 TEU is connected with several articles of the CFREU but also with Art. 7 TEU. The theories are varied but what helps us to understand and better analyze and understand the values of the EU is the jurisprudence of the CJEU. Substantive profiles that lead us to analyze a variety of arguments and themes such as the European arrest warrant, the right to expression, the principle of democracy, etc. But also to answer certain questions, i.e. What are the jurisdictional remedies of Art. 2 TEU? What types of appeals can it makes? What articles can be included with it? Can it alone be a subject of litigation and be presented before the CJEU? These are some of the topics discussed in our survey.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
