Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Popular receiver architectures use the superheterodyne technique to trap source frequencies using associated discrete analog signal processing devices. Nurturing and processing faint intercepted signals through several analog stages to a digital backend via coaxial feed has hitherto resulted in expensive, bogus, non – reproducible receiver systems that are susceptible to drifts. Hence, the complexities that characterize radio astronomy receiver design. This paper highlights the inherent problems associated with conventional superheterodyne radio astronomy receiver architecture and presents a new optimized architecture that solved most of the inherent problems and offers better reliability and reproducibility without compromising performance.
ADC, Analog, Digital, LNA, Mixer, Superheterodyne.
ADC, Analog, Digital, LNA, Mixer, Superheterodyne.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 6 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts